Function pointers can have a slight performance impact compared to direct function calls, but in most cases, the difference is negligible. Let's break this down:
When you call a function directly, the compiler knows exactly which function to call at compile-time. This allows for potential optimizations:
#include <iostream>
void DirectFunction() {
std::cout << "Direct call\n";
}
int main() {
DirectFunction();
return 0;
}
Direct call
In this case, the compiler might inline the function call, effectively replacing the function call with the function's body, eliminating the overhead of the function call entirely.
When using a function pointer, the situation is different:
#include <iostream>
void IndirectFunction() {
std::cout << "Indirect call\n";
}
int main() {
void (*funcPtr)() = IndirectFunction;
funcPtr();
return 0;
}
Indirect call
Here, the compiler can't know at compile-time which function will be called. This introduces a level of indirection:
This extra step can introduce a small performance overhead. However, modern CPUs are very good at predicting these jumps, so the impact is often minimal.
In most cases, the performance difference is negligible and shouldn't be a concern unless you're working on extremely performance-critical code. Here are some points to consider:
Remember, premature optimization is the root of all evil. Unless profiling shows that function pointer calls are a bottleneck in your specific application, you shouldn't worry too much about this performance difference. The flexibility and power that function pointers provide often outweigh the minimal performance impact.
Answers to questions are automatically generated and may not have been reviewed.
Learn to create flexible and modular code with function pointers