Callbacks and Function Pointers

Function Pointers and Overloading

How do function pointers interact with function overloading?

Abstract art representing computer programming

Function pointers and function overloading can interact in interesting ways. Let's explore this relationship and some of the challenges it can present.

Basic Overloading

First, let's remind ourselves what function overloading looks like:

#include <iostream>

void Print(int x) {
  std::cout << "Integer: " << x << "\n";
}

void Print(double x) {
  std::cout << "Double: " << x << "\n";
}

int main() {
  Print(5);
  Print(3.14);
}
Integer: 5
Double: 3.14

The compiler chooses the correct function based on the argument type.

Function Pointers and Overloading

When using function pointers with overloaded functions, we need to be explicit about which overload we're referring to. The function pointer's type must match exactly with one of the overloads:

#include <iostream>

void Print(int x) {
  std::cout << "Integer: " << x << "\n";
}

void Print(double x) {
  std::cout << "Double: " << x << "\n";
}

int main() {
  void (*intPrinter)(int) = Print; 
  void (*doublePrinter)(double) = Print; 

  intPrinter(5);
  doublePrinter(3.14);
}
Integer: 5
Double: 3.14

In this case, we're explicitly choosing which overload to use based on the type of the function pointer.

Challenges with Overloading

Overloading can sometimes lead to ambiguity when using function pointers. Consider this example:

#include <iostream>

void Ambiguous(int x) {
  std::cout << "Int version: " << x << "\n";
}

void Ambiguous(long x) {
  std::cout << "Long version: " << x << "\n";
}

int main() {
  // This would be ambiguous:
  // auto funcPtr = Ambiguous; 

  void (*funcPtr)(int) = Ambiguous; 
  funcPtr(5);
}
Int version: 5

In this case, we have to explicitly specify the type of the function pointer to resolve the ambiguity. Using auto would result in a compilation error because the compiler can't determine which overload to choose.

Function Templates and Overloading

Function templates add another layer of complexity:

#include <iostream>

template <typename T>
void TemplateFunc(T x) {
  std::cout << "\nTemplate: " << x << "\n";
}

void TemplateFunc(int x) {
  std::cout << "\nInt specialization: " << x;
}

int main() {
  void (*intPtr)(int) = TemplateFunc; 
  intPtr(5);

  auto genericPtr = TemplateFunc<double>; 
  genericPtr(3.14);
}
Int specialization: 5
Template: 3.14

Here, we're able to select between the non-template overload and a specific instantiation of the template function.

In conclusion, while function pointers can work with overloaded functions, you need to be explicit about which overload you're referring to.

This often means specifying the exact type of the function pointer or using explicit template instantiation. Always be mindful of potential ambiguities when working with overloaded functions and function pointers.

This Question is from the Lesson:

Callbacks and Function Pointers

Learn to create flexible and modular code with function pointers

Answers to questions are automatically generated and may not have been reviewed.

This Question is from the Lesson:

Callbacks and Function Pointers

Learn to create flexible and modular code with function pointers

sdl2-promo.jpg
Part of the course:

Game Dev with SDL2

Learn C++ and SDL development by creating hands on, practical projects inspired by classic retro games

Free, unlimited access

This course includes:

  • 67 Lessons
  • 100+ Code Samples
  • 91% Positive Reviews
  • Regularly Updated
  • Help and FAQ
Free, Unlimited Access

Professional C++

Comprehensive course covering advanced concepts, and how to use them on large-scale projects.

Screenshot from Warhammer: Total War
Screenshot from Tomb Raider
Screenshot from Jedi: Fallen Order
Contact|Privacy Policy|Terms of Use
Copyright © 2024 - All Rights Reserved