Using std::reduce()
in multi-threaded applications offers performance benefits, but there are several caveats to be aware of to ensure correct and efficient execution.
For std::reduce()
to work correctly in a multi-threaded context, the operation used must be both commutative and associative. This means:
If the operation is not commutative or associative, std::reduce()
may produce different results each time it is run, leading to non-deterministic behavior.
Example of a commutative and associative operation:
#include <execution>
#include <iostream>
#include <numeric>
#include <vector>
int main() {
std::vector<int> numbers{1, 2, 3, 4, 5};
int result = std::reduce(
std::execution::par,
numbers.begin(),
numbers.end(),
0,
std::plus<>{}
);
std::cout << "Result: " << result;
}
Result: 15
When using std::reduce()
in a multi-threaded context, ensure that any shared resources are handled safely.
Access to shared resources should be synchronized to avoid race conditions and undefined behavior.
Parallel execution can introduce memory overhead due to the creation of multiple threads and the need to manage these threads.
This overhead might negate the performance benefits for smaller datasets or simpler operations.
Handling exceptions in a multi-threaded context can be challenging. If an exception is thrown during the execution of std::reduce()
, it must be safely propagated to avoid crashing the application.
One way to handle this is to use a std::promise
to communicate exceptions between threads. Here's an example that captures exceptions correctly:
#include <execution>
#include <future>
#include <iostream>
#include <numeric>
#include <stdexcept>
#include <vector>
int safeAdd(int a, int b) {
if (a == 3)
throw std::runtime_error("Error occurred");
return a + b;
}
int main() {
std::vector<int> numbers{1, 2, 3, 4, 5};
int result = 0;
std::promise<void> promise;
std::future<void> future = promise.get_future();
std::atomic<bool> exceptionCaught(false);
try {
std::for_each(
std::execution::par, numbers.begin(),
numbers.end(), [&](int n) {
try {
result = std::reduce( numbers.begin(),
numbers.end(), 0, safeAdd);
} catch (...) {
if (!exceptionCaught.exchange(true)) {
promise.set_exception(
std::current_exception());
}
}
});
if (!exceptionCaught.load()) {
promise.set_value();
}
} catch (...) {
// This block is for any exceptions not
// caught in the parallel section
std::cerr << "Exception caught in main block\n";
}
try {
future.get();
} catch (const std::exception& e) {
std::cerr << "Exception caught: "
<< e.what() << '\n';
}
std::cout << "Result: " << result;
}
Exception caught: Error occurred
Result: 0
By considering these caveats, you can leverage std::reduce()
effectively in multi-threaded applications while avoiding common pitfalls.
Answers to questions are automatically generated and may not have been reviewed.
A detailed guide to generating a single object from collections using the std::reduce()
and std::accumulate()
algorithms