Thread Safety of Unique Pointers

Is it safe to use unique pointers in multithreaded applications?

Using std::unique_ptr in multithreaded applications is generally safe, but with some important caveats. Let's break this down:

Thread Safety of the Pointer Itself

The std::unique_ptr itself is not thread-safe. This means that if you have multiple threads trying to modify the same unique_ptr (e.g., resetting it, moving it, or destroying it), you need to provide your own synchronization mechanisms, such as mutexes.

#include <memory>
#include <mutex>

std::unique_ptr<Character> GlobalCharacter;
std::mutex CharacterMutex;

void UpdateCharacter() {
  std::lock_guard<std::mutex> Lock{CharacterMutex};
  GlobalCharacter = std::make_unique<Character>("Aragorn");
}

Thread Safety of the Pointed-to Object

The thread safety of the object that the unique_ptr points to depends on the object itself, not on the unique_ptr. If multiple threads are accessing the pointed-to object concurrently, you need to ensure that the object itself is thread-safe or provide appropriate synchronization.

#include <memory>
#include <mutex>

class ThreadSafeCharacter {
  mutable std::mutex Mtx;
  std::string Name;

public:
  void SetName(const std::string& NewName) {
    std::lock_guard<std::mutex> Lock{Mtx};
    Name = NewName;
  }
};

std::unique_ptr<ThreadSafeCharacter> GlobalCharacter;

Unique Ownership and Threading

The unique ownership model of std::unique_ptr can actually be beneficial in multithreaded scenarios. Since only one unique_ptr can own an object at a time, it can help prevent issues like multiple threads trying to delete the same object.

However, be cautious when transferring ownership between threads:

#include <memory>
#include <thread>

void ProcessCharacter(std::unique_ptr<Character> Char) {
  // Process the character
}

int main() {
  auto Frodo{std::make_unique<Character>("Frodo")};
  std::thread T{ProcessCharacter, std::move(Frodo)}; 
  T.join();
  // After this, Frodo is nullptr
}

In conclusion, while std::unique_ptr itself isn't inherently thread-safe, its unique ownership model can be valuable in multithreaded applications. Just remember to handle synchronization for the pointer itself and the pointed-to object when necessary.

Memory Ownership and Smart Pointers

Learn how to manage dynamic memory using unique pointers and the concept of memory ownership

Questions & Answers

Answers are generated by AI models and may not have been reviewed. Be mindful when running any code on your device.

Performance of Unique Pointers
What's the performance overhead of using unique pointers compared to raw pointers in C++?
Unique Pointers to Const Objects
Is it possible to create a unique pointer to a const object in C++?
Deleting Raw Pointers from Unique Pointers
What happens if I try to delete the raw pointer obtained from the get() method of a unique pointer?
Reset vs Release for Unique Pointers
What's the difference between reset() and release() for unique pointers?
Unique Pointers with C-style APIs
Can I use unique pointers with C-style APIs that expect raw pointers?
Returning Unique Pointers from Functions
What's the best way to return a unique pointer from a function?
Copyable Classes with Unique Pointers
How can I use unique pointers in a class that needs to be copyable?
Or Ask your Own Question
Get an immediate answer to your specific question using our AI assistant