std::function vs Raw Function Pointers

While std::function provides a more flexible and user-friendly interface compared to raw function pointers, it does come with some trade-offs. Let's explore the limitations and drawbacks of using std::function:

std::function typically has more overhead than a raw function pointer. This is because std::function is designed to be more flexible and can store different types of callable objects (functions, lambdas, functors), which requires some internal machinery.

Additionally, the compiler

1#include <chrono>
2#include <functional>
3#include <iostream>
4
5void SimpleFunction() {
6  std::cout << "Working...\n";
7}
8
9int main() {
10  using namespace std::chrono;
11  const int iterations = 10000;
12
13  // Raw function pointer
14  void (*rawPtr)() = SimpleFunction;
15  auto start = high_resolution_clock::now();
16
17  for (int i = 0; i < iterations; ++i) {
18    rawPtr();
19  }
20  auto end = high_resolution_clock::now();
21  auto a = end - start;
22
23  // std::function
24  std::function funcObj = SimpleFunction;
25  start = high_resolution_clock::now();
26
27  for (int i = 0; i < iterations; ++i) {
28    funcObj();
29  }
30  end = high_resolution_clock::now();
31  auto b = end - start;
32
33  std::cout << "Raw pointer time: "
34    << duration_cast<microseconds>(a).count()
35    << " microseconds\n";
36
37  std::cout << "std::function time: "
38    << duration_cast<microseconds>(b).count()
39    << " microseconds\n";
40}

The output might look something like this:

1Raw pointer time: 353511 microseconds
2std::function time: 428451 microseconds

Note that the actual numbers will vary depending on your system, compiler, and optimization settings.

std::function uses more memory than a raw function pointer. It needs to allocate some extra space to handle its type-erasure mechanism and potential small object optimization.

Raw function pointers provide compile-time polymorphism, while std::function provides runtime polymorphism. This means that with raw function pointers, the compiler can potentially make more optimizations.

Like raw function pointers, std::function doesn't preserve information about default arguments:

1#include <functional>
2#include <iostream>
3
4void Greet(const char* name = "World") {
5  std::cout << "Hello, " << name << "!\n";
6}
7
8int main() {
9  std::function<void(const char*)> greet = Greet;
10
11  // greet(); // This would be an error 
12  greet("Alice");  // This works 
13}

1Hello, Alice!

std::function can sometimes make overload resolution more complex, especially when dealing with function templates. The following program generates a compiler error as it's ambiguous what function we're assigning to printFunc:

1#include <iostream>
2#include <functional>
3
4template<typename T>
5void Print(T value) {
6  std::cout << "\nTemplate: " << value << "\n";
7}
8
9void Print(int value) {
10  std::cout << "\nNon-Template: " << value << "\n";
11}
12
13int main() {
14  std::function<void(int)> printFunc = Print;
15}

1error: 'initializing': cannot convert from 'overloaded-function' to 'std::function<void (int)>'

We can resolve the ambiguity like this:

1#include <functional>
2#include <iostream>
3
4template <typename T>
5void Print(T value) {
6  std::cout << "\nTemplate: " << value;
7}
8
9void Print(int value) {
10  std::cout << "\nNon-Template: " << value;
11}
12
13int main() {
14  std::function printTemplateFunc = Print<int>;
15  printTemplateFunc(5);
16
17  std::function printFunc = static_cast<
18    void(*)(int)>(Print);
19  printFunc(5);
20}

1Template: 5
2Non-Template: 5

Unlike raw function pointers, which can be compared directly to nullptr, std::function has a nullable state that's checked at runtime:

1#include <functional>
2#include <iostream>
3
4void SomeFunction() {}
5
6int main() {
7  std::function<void()> func;
8
9  if (func) {  
10    std::cout << "func is not empty\n";
11  } else {
12    std::cout << "func is empty\n";
13  }
14
15  func = SomeFunction;
16
17  if (func) {  
18    std::cout << "Now func is not empty\n";
19  }
20
21  return 0;
22}

1func is empty
2Now func is not empty

This runtime check can add a small overhead compared to raw function pointers.

Despite these limitations, std::function is often the preferred choice in modern C++ due to its flexibility and ease of use. The performance difference is negligible for most applications, and the benefits of type safety and flexibility often outweigh the drawbacks.

However, in performance-critical code or when working with older codebases, raw function pointers might still be the better choice.