The Rule of Five is a guideline in C++ that suggests that if a class defines any of the following special member functions, it should probably define all five:
The reasoning behind this rule is that these functions are usually interconnected. If a class needs to define one of them for correct operation, it likely needs to define the others as well.
For example, if a class manages a resource (like dynamically allocated memory) and defines a custom destructor to release that resource, it should also define a copy constructor and copy assignment operator to properly copy that resource. Otherwise, copying the object could lead to issues like double-deletion of the resource.
When C++11 introduced move semantics, the Rule of Five was born as an extension of the Rule of Three (which covered only the destructor, copy constructor, and copy assignment operator). If a class defines a move constructor or move assignment operator, it's probably because it manages a resource that can be efficiently moved. In that case, it should also define the destructor and copy operations for completeness.
Here's an example of a class that follows the Rule of Five:
class Resource {
public:
// Default constructor
Resource();
// Destructor
~Resource();
// Copy constructor
Resource(const Resource& other);
// Copy assignment
Resource& operator=(const Resource& other);
// Move constructor
Resource(Resource&& other);
// Move assignment
Resource& operator=(Resource&& other);
private:
// ...
};
By defining all five special member functions, Resource
ensures that it can be constructed, destroyed, copied, and moved correctly, providing a complete and consistent interface.
Answers to questions are automatically generated and may not have been reviewed.
Learn how we can improve the performance of our types using move constructors, move assignment operators and std::move()