Yes, you can store std::filesystem::path
objects in standard containers like std::vector
. The std::filesystem::path
class is designed to be used just like any other standard library type, making it suitable for use in containers.
std::vector
Here’s an example of storing std::filesystem::path
objects in a std::vector
:
#include <filesystem>
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
int main() {
std::vector<std::filesystem::path> paths;
paths.push_back(R"(C:\path\to\file1.txt)");
paths.push_back(R"(C:\path\to\file2.txt)");
paths.push_back(R"(C:\path\to\file3.txt)");
for (const auto& path : paths) {
std::cout << "Path: " << path.string() << '\n';
}
}
Path: C:\path\to\file1.txt
Path: C:\path\to\file2.txt
Path: C:\path\to\file3.txt
std::filesystem::path
works seamlessly with standard containers like std::vector
, std::list
, and std::map
.std::filesystem::path
is a type-safe representation of paths, making it easier to avoid errors compared to raw strings.Using containers to manage paths is practical for applications that handle multiple files or directories. For example, you might collect all files in a directory and process them:
#include <filesystem>
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
int main() {
std::vector<std::filesystem::path> paths;
std::filesystem::path dir{R"(C:\test)"};
for (const auto& entry
: std::filesystem::directory_iterator(dir)) {
if (entry.is_regular_file()) {
paths.push_back(entry.path());
}
}
for (const auto& path : paths) {
std::cout << "File: " << path.string() << '\n';
}
}
File: C:\test\file1.txt
File: C:\test\file2.txt
Storing std::filesystem::path
objects in containers like std::vector
is straightforward and enhances the management of multiple file paths in your applications.
This approach leverages the full power of the C++ Standard Library while ensuring type safety and flexibility.
Answers to questions are automatically generated and may not have been reviewed.
A guide to effectively working with file system paths, using the path
type within the standard library's filesystem
module.